Gelatin, collagen peptides, plant extracts and tea powder entering Japan for the first time all start with the same filing. Japan’s Food Sanitation Act (食品衛生法) requires anyone importing food or food additives for business purposes to file a Food Import Notification (食品等輸入届出書) with the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW) before the customs declaration; the filing is received at the food-monitoring window of one of the 32 quarantine stations nationwide.
For an overseas supplier shipping any of these ingredients, the practical questions are what triggers a mandatory inspection instead of a spot-check, which pesticide and additive rules apply to a raw ingredient, and how much of Japan’s consumer labelling law applies to a business-to-business material. The sections below take each in turn.
Key points
- The import notification has to reach the quarantine station before the customs declaration.
- Business-to-business ingredients have a lighter labelling regime than retail food: no mandatory net-content declaration and no single-box label format.
- Bovine-derived gelatin and collagen carry an extra BSE-related import restriction on top of ordinary food rules.
What has to be filed before a food ingredient shipment clears Japanese customs?
Anyone importing food, food additives, equipment, containers and packaging, or certain infant toys for business purposes must submit a Food Import Notification (食品等輸入届出書) before the import declaration, to the food-monitoring window of the quarantine station handling the shipment; Japan has 32 such windows nationwide. The quarantine station reviews the documents and, where it sees a need, tests a sample to check for harmful substances and for compliance with food sanitation standards (MHLW, imported food monitoring FAQ).
A small quantity imported for personal use, display, research, decoration or internal company evaluation does not need this filing. If any of that batch is later to be distributed or sold to consumers, the notification is required, so a sample shipment that turns into a commercial order needs the filing at that point.
Command inspection or monitoring inspection: what is the practical difference?
Japan runs two separate inspection regimes for imported food. A command inspection (命令検査) applies to food judged more likely to violate the law: every shipment must be inspected, the importer pays for it, and the goods cannot be imported until the result is known. A monitoring inspection (モニタリング検査) is a planned, risk-based spot-check: the government pays, and the shipment can be imported before the result comes back (MHLW, imported food monitoring FAQ).
| Inspection type | Trigger | Who pays | Can the shipment move before results? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Command inspection (命令検査) | Food with an elevated likelihood of violation | Importer | No — held until the result is known |
| Monitoring inspection (モニタリング検査) | Planned, risk-based sampling | Government | Yes — shipment can proceed first |
What do the positive list and additive rules actually restrict?
Since 2006-05-29, Japan’s positive list (ポジティブリスト制度) has applied a uniform default limit of 0.01 mg of pesticide residue per kilogram of food (0.01ppm) to any pesticide without its own residue standard, under the Food Sanitation Act. A plant-derived ingredient for which no specific limit has been set is judged against that same 0.01ppm default. Terra Vista’s positive list and tea compliance guide covers how this works for tea in more detail.
A food additive used inside an ingredient, such as a colourant or flavouring extracted from a plant, must be on MHLW’s designated additives list or its existing additives list before it can be imported or sold; an unlisted substance cannot be used. As of 2019-03-31 the designated list held 455 items, up from 413 in May 2011. A later official count was not confirmed for this article; the quarantine station handling a shipment can confirm whether a given substance is currently listed.
Separately, about 365 substances sit on Japan’s existing additives list (既存添加物): natural additives with a long history of use in Japan, which a 1995 amendment exempted from the designation review that new additives must pass. Packaging matters too when the ingredient ships in synthetic resin containers: Japan’s positive list for food-contact synthetic resin utensils, containers and packaging has applied in full since 2025-06-01, after a five-year transition period, per Japan’s Consumer Affairs Agency (CAA, food-contact container positive list).
Does a business-to-business ingredient need the same label as a retail food product?
No. Japan’s Food Labelling Standards give business-use processed food (anything not packaged in the form in which a consumer buys it) a lighter regime: it still has to carry the substance of the standard disclosures, but not inside a single label box, and without a mandatory net-content (内容量) declaration. That information can instead sit on the product’s own container or packaging, the delivery note, the invoice or the specification sheet.
Where the importer is the business responsible for the label, the “manufacturer / processor / importer” field reads 輸入者 (importer) and gives the importer’s place of business as the address, and the importer answers for the labelling content of that ingredient inside Japan. The business-use exemption changes the format and where the information appears; the responsibility stays with the importer.
Do gelatin, collagen and collagen peptides face any extra import requirement?
Yes, on top of ordinary food rules. As part of Japan’s BSE (bovine spongiform encephalopathy) countermeasures, gelatin and collagen made from bovine hide or bone, and food containing them, are barred from import when sourced from a country or region where BSE has occurred. MHLW re-examined its BSE measures in 2013, including cattle age thresholds and the scope of specified risk materials, but the current exact exception conditions were not confirmed for this article, so none are stated here. An importer should confirm the current country and tissue restrictions with the receiving quarantine station before sourcing bovine-derived material.
Beyond the BSE rule, the Japan Gelatin and Collagen Industry Association lists three practical compliance points: proof that the raw material can be traced to animals raised under local meat-production standards; residue limits converted for the concentration factor of a dried, concentrated ingredient (roughly three to five times the raw material); and a low risk from oil-soluble pesticides, because the raw material is washed and acid- or alkali-treated and the finished product has a fat content of around 0.3% (Japan Gelatin & Collagen Industry Association).
How is a plant extract judged: food additive or food?
Japan judges this by how the extract is used, not by what it is made from. Japan’s Food Sanitation Act defines a food additive as a substance added, mixed or infiltrated into food during manufacturing or processing, or to preserve it. A plant extract used as a colourant or flavouring can be judged a food additive and must then appear on the designated or existing additives list; an extract used simply as a food ingredient, without that additive function, is treated as an ordinary food instead. Either way, a business importer files the same import notification with the quarantine station, together with supporting documents that describe the raw material and the manufacturing process.
Where to start: a Japan food import check sheet
Terra Vista Co., Ltd., a Japan-incorporated company, can act as the 輸入者 (importer of record) for food ingredients, the party that files the import notification and is responsible for the label inside Japan. The first document is a Japan food import check sheet: what filing the shipment needs, which inspection regime it is likely to fall under, and what the business-use label must show, returned within five business days.
Request a Japan food import check sheet (5 business days)
For tea specifically, see Terra Vista’s positive list and tea compliance guide. For who takes on the importer role, see Japan importer of record; for the compliance sequence beyond food, see six questions that set a compliance route and cross-border compliance for Japan market entry.
Official sources to check first
- MHLW · Imported food monitoring FAQ: the notification requirement, the 32 quarantine windows, and the two inspection types.
- MHLW · Positive list for pesticide residues: the 2006-05-29 effective date and the 0.01ppm default.
- MHLW · Designated food additives reference.
- Consumer Affairs Agency · Positive list for food-contact containers and packaging.
- Japan Gelatin & Collagen Industry Association · import compliance points for gelatin and collagen.
Frequently asked questions
Does a small sample shipment of a food ingredient need a Food Import Notification?
Not if it is genuinely for personal use, display, research, decoration or internal evaluation. If any part of that shipment is later to be distributed or sold to consumers, the notification is required, so a sample that turns into a commercial order needs the filing at that point.
What is the difference between command inspection and monitoring inspection for imported food?
Command inspection (命令検査) covers food judged more likely to violate the law: every shipment is inspected, the importer pays, and the goods cannot move until the result is known. Monitoring inspection (モニタリング検査) is a planned, risk-based spot-check paid for by the government, and the shipment can proceed before the result comes back.
Does a food ingredient sold business-to-business need the same label as a retail product?
No. Business-use processed food still needs the substance of Japan’s standard disclosures, but not inside a single label box and without a mandatory net-content declaration; that information can instead sit on the delivery note, invoice or specification sheet.
Is there an extra rule for gelatin and collagen made from cattle?
Yes. As part of Japan’s BSE countermeasures, bovine-derived gelatin and collagen are barred from import when sourced from a country or region where BSE has occurred. The current exceptions by country and tissue were not confirmed for this article, so check them with the receiving quarantine station before sourcing.
How does Japan decide whether a plant extract is a food additive or an ordinary food?
By how it is used. An extract used as a colourant or flavouring can be judged a food additive and must then be on Japan’s designated or existing additives list; used simply as an ingredient without that function, it is treated as an ordinary food instead.
Related pages
Related: Japan positive list and tea compliance guide; Japan importer of record; Six questions that set a compliance route; Cross-border compliance for Japan market entry; Supply chain and sourcing; Terra Vista contact page.
Talk to our team
Get a tailored answer on sourcing, market entry or compliance — free consultation, three languages.